WHAT THE HELL

Kevin Brennan Writes About What It's Like

Android authors right around the corner? Affirmative!

russian-robot
When you read this linked article, as you should, you might wonder if Dystopia is imminent after all.

I’ve written before about services like Oyster Books, which offer readers Netflix-like access to all the books they can possibly read for one low-low monthly fee. All well and good — maybe. What authors get out of these arrangements is a little murky. But one way authors get paid is by getting credit for a sale when an Oyster reader, for instance, reads beyond the 10% mark in a given book. (Other similar services have different percentage goalposts.)

The freaky thing about all this is that the companies, in tracking this information for sales purposes, have inadvertently landed on another packet of data with value. They now know where people stop reading a given book, and they know how many people in their database who request the book stop reading it. This has implications, as the article spells out. For one thing, publishers can compile the data provided by Oyster et al. and demonstrate to an author where readers gave up on her novel. “That part where Sophie had to choose between her son and her daughter? People don’t like it. Next time, make it happier.”

Obviously no good can come of this, right? Right? Authors shouldn’t have to mold their work to suit the whims of the marketplace, should they? If they do, aren’t they commodifying their art? Doesn’t writing become more like manufacturing consumable products that have to be the same shape, size, and color coming off the assembly line, or buyers look elsewhere? What this service is offering publishers, in effect, is quality control.

And yet, the data do represent something. Votes. Opinions. Polling. Subscribers to the service are a focus group of thousands (one day, millions), and I’m willing to bet that traditional publishers will be prepared to pay for the details. They might not call upon authors to change their work to suit the mob, but they might be inclined to select only those manuscripts that fit the proven paradigms. (One gets the feeling they’re already well on their way down that dead-end alley…)

But why stop at merely referencing the information to help authors craft their next novels more, shall we say, satisfactorily? It sounds to me like the data will be granular enough that actual books could be generated from them, machine-written, in other words, eliminating the fussy author altogether. After all, the author is the sand in the tanning lotion: demanding money for his efforts, complaining about editorial integrity and artistic freedom, wanting input on cover art. A robot author would do as he was told, no more no less. Eureka!

I really hope things don’t go in that direction, but crap — why is it so easy to imagine?

Advertisements

11 comments on “Android authors right around the corner? Affirmative!

  1. Phillip McCollum
    January 14, 2014

    Well, behind every machine is a human that programs it. I’m sure there will be machines programming machines at some point, but by then, it will no longer be cool and hipsters will be clamoring for works by human authors the world over.

  2. John W. Howell
    January 14, 2014

    “Dave what are you doing Dave?” (from 2001 Space Odyssey)

  3. sknicholls
    January 14, 2014

    They are already doing this. There is a group of students at a University who have a computer program…you can type in a few keywords and Voila! A short story. Don’t like the way it is going, change a few keywords and Voila! A new version. I wish I still had the link to the site but I have lost it. I played with it for a few days. So far, it is only generating 1500 words or less. Imagine the possibilities.

    Have you heard of this guy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_M._Parker

    Geez…and I was just getting started.

    • Kevin Brennan
      January 14, 2014

      Whoa! No, I never heard of Parker, but obviously he’s way ahead of the curve here. Not that that’s a good thing…

      • sknicholls
        January 14, 2014

        Most of his books are non-fiction summary types of data collection on certain topics, but still…the possibilities, and those students were generating fiction stories. I wish I could find the link to the site. You could type in twenty words and get a fiction story…all computer generated.

  4. ericjbaker
    January 15, 2014

    Yay! I can’t wait for the rewarding experience of fiction written by algorithm. If I don’t get a good cry every 23.7 pages, I will go to a different software developer.

    • Kevin Brennan
      January 15, 2014

      Eventually maybe you can just download a book into your head and not have to go to the trouble of “reading” it.

      • ericjbaker
        January 15, 2014

        Better yet, my iPaperweight can scan it and tell me how much I would have enjoyed it based on my internet “likes.”

Chime in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 14, 2014 by in Publishing, Writing and tagged , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: