WHAT THE HELL

Kevin Brennan Writes About What It's Like

Farts unknown

doh

As the inauguration approaches, and I try to stifle a nauseous gag, I need to express a little frustration with something Anthony Bourdain said recently. It was on New Year’s Day that I read excerpts of an interview he did on Reason.com. Bourdain, he of CNN’s Parts Unknown (I had the title first!), thinks liberal attitudes caused the salt-of-the-earth backlash that has ushered in Trump.

The utter contempt with which privileged Eastern liberals such as myself discuss red-state, gun-country, working-class America as ridiculous and morons and rubes is largely responsible for the upswell of rage and contempt and desire to pull down the temple that we’re seeing now.

Though he includes himself in the charge, he misses the point completely. It’s not that we liberals hold white working-class, flyover-state people in contempt. Hell, many of us come from that world. I’m from Missouri — now one of the reddest of red states. I’m not a self-loathing Midwesterner. Instead it’s the ideas and opinions of a lot of white working-class people that I’m fighting against.

Bourdain doesn’t address these ideas and opinions. He uses the straw man argument that liberal elites are not hearing these ideas. We’re not listening. He says these simple working folk are tired of being talked down to by overeducated, pinheaded, pencil-necked brainiacs who think they’re better than them.

Hey, it’s easy to talk down to someone who thinks that guns ought to be allowed in schools, churches, and movie theaters. It’s easy to talk down to someone who wants to deport twelve million illegal immigrants and build a thousands-of-miles-long wall along the border with Mexico. It’s easy to talk down to someone who wants to make abortion illegal, even when the life of the mother is at risk or when she was raped. It’s easy to talk down to someone who wants to impose one religion on public schoolchildren, or to get rid of public schools altogether. It’s easy to talk down to someone who wants to bomb Iran into submission. It’s easy to talk down to someone who wants to teach creationism as if it’s a viable, tested theory on the same plane as evolution. And it’s easy to talk down to someone who wants to take away our already-inadequate safety net, mainly from people of color who don’t start life on third base and have to struggle against a debilitating social current from the moment they’re aware of their own identity.

Many of these ideas boil down to a sense of insecurity, and much of the time white working-class people aim their rage at someone who is different from them. Immigrants, Muslims, Muslim immigrants, intellectuals. A white-supremacist group is trying to eradicate one Montana town of its Jewish residents. Oh joy. North Carolina has been diligent in suppressing the vote of its African-American population, so much so that a Federal Appeals Court declared that a recent voting rights law there “targets African Americans with almost surgical precision.” The U.S. Supreme Court agreed. Wisconsin is removing mentions of climate change from its Department of Natural Resources website. And don’t get me started on how, in the name of populism, the new congress will be repealing the Affordable Care Act and depriving millions of people of coverage (many of them, ironically, white working-class).

If Bourdain is right, we should have been listening to this subgroup of voters and, I assume, delivering on their demands. I don’t see how merely listening would have done the trick. Calling them “a basket of deplorables” was a terrible idea, but we all know that Hillary meant the blatant racists and misogynists, not the grassroots, ordinary Americans who are, by and large, people of good intentions.

Unfortunately much of their rage is misplaced. But when confronted with facts that contradict their sense of things, the resulting knee-jerk reaction causes the kind of political turmoil we’re about to live through for at least four years. I’m sorry, but it’s a fact that the top one percent have been vacuuming wealth from the bottom up for the past forty years, and it’s especially bad for people of color. Lashing out at liberals and the mainstream media only postpones a solution that will work. Revive the coal industry? You gotta be kidding me. Cut taxes for the rich? They fall for it every time. How about paying better wages? Somehow the populist rhetoric never gets around to that one. How about reviving the labor movement so we can fight on a more level playing field?

To give in to the odious ideas that have been velcroed to the white Rust Belt demographic — maybe without their knowledge or permission — is to succumb to the worst in us, the fear and prejudice that we’ve been fighting for the last fifty years. Accepting those ideas as reasonable is a terrible mistake.

So, Anthony — if you want to help undo all of the progress that’s been made since WWII, if you want to take a giant step backward, go ahead and give credence to Trump’s policies by criticizing their critics like Bill Maher. I, for one, believe that we can’t normalize destructive ideas by putting them on the same table with humanistic but apparently pie-in-the-sky notions like economic equality, true religious freedom, universal education (and health care), and racial cooperation.

One idea that we’ve lost track of in this country is that of the commonweal. The best course for all of us. And the sooner we find our way back to that as our prime motive, the sooner we’ll stop heading toward self-destruction by pitting one group’s interests against all others while the kleptocrats pick our pockets.

Advertisements

5 comments on “Farts unknown

  1. kingmidget
    January 18, 2017

    Hard to figure out how to respond to this because I agree with you and I agree with Bourdain. There has to be a way to express disagreement with those ideas without doing so disdainfully. Truth is, it’s not their ideas that I am disdainful of no matter how opposed I am to many of those ideas. No, I’m disdainful of their refusal to deal in a reality-based world. You know … like facts and science. Had an interchange on FB who cited completely wrong statistics 5 times for every correct statistic he cited, but there was no shaking him of his absolute belief that “everything Obama touched has gone sour.” That Obama has “wreaked havoc on the economy.” That it’s Obama’s fault that the budget deficit soared — even though he inherited it from Bush. The list could go on. No, I’m not disdainful of their ideas — I’m disdainful of their inability to deal with truth and facts. But there needs to be a way to express that without saying “you’re an idiot.” And, yes, I struggle with that last part. 😉

    • Kevin Brennan
      January 18, 2017

      You know, on one level, I think the “disdainful” treatment of white working-class people is overblown. You don’t hear it in the media, you don’t hear Democratic politicians belittling them (other than Hillary’s unwise comment!), and, frankly, I’d never say anything directly to someone else that would make them feel like I was putting them down. Where’d this whole thing come from, other than right wingers saying it’s so?

      But I’m with you on the “real world” problem. When we can’t agree on what’s a fact, the dialogue collapses.

      • kingmidget
        January 18, 2017

        Actually, I disagree … you do see it in the media (look at op-eds and the talking head shows on the mainstream media and the posts and comments sections on liberal blogs). The reality is that disdain goes both way. We on the left for those on the right who don’t live up to our standards and on the right for those who don’t live up to their standards. We have become a country divided by disdain and disgust for each other. And you see it in policies put forward to Democrats. I’m a firm believer that the Dems lost the white working class for many reasons, but one of the biggest was how Dems and the federal government handled the transgender issue. With the success of the long fight to secure gay marriage, liberals and progressives immediately started looking for the next social issue to win on. Transgender rights because the next “big thing” for those liberals and progressives — or at least some subset of them. And we lost sight of how the fight for gay marriage achieved success. It was a long struggle. A long struggle that involved a lot of foundation building. And we did none of that with transgender rights — we went straight into the federal government dictating to the states what they must do. To me that was disdainful of what others thought were legitimate issues/concerns with the policies pushed by liberals and progressives. We were arrogant and over-confident and the best way to lose the white working-class is to be arrogant and over-confident and let those factors lead us to force our will on others without fighting the long battle needed to bring the mainstream along with us.

      • Kevin Brennan
        January 18, 2017

        Sorry … I just don’t detect it in the mainstream or op-eds. Eye of the beholder, I guess …

      • kingmidget
        January 19, 2017

        I’ll have to find some. 😉

Chime in

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 18, 2017 by in Et alia and tagged , .
%d bloggers like this: